wangyang0918 commented on a change in pull request #14692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14692#discussion_r560073139



##########
File path: 
flink-kubernetes/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/KubernetesClusterDescriptor.java
##########
@@ -125,6 +121,16 @@ public String getClusterDescription() {
         };
     }
 
+    private String getWebMonitorAddress(Configuration configuration) throws 
Exception {
+        HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.AddressResolution resolution =
+                
HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.AddressResolution.TRY_ADDRESS_RESOLUTION;
+        if 
(configuration.get(KubernetesConfigOptions.REST_SERVICE_EXPOSED_TYPE)
+                == KubernetesConfigOptions.ServiceExposedType.ClusterIP) {
+            resolution = 
HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.AddressResolution.NO_ADDRESS_RESOLUTION;
+        }
+        return 
HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.getWebMonitorAddress(configuration, resolution);
+    }

Review comment:
       Flink client communicates with the cluster via namespaced service if 
ClusterIP is chosen.
   
   I assume you mean directly return a `RestClusterClient` using the namespaced 
service(aka `restEndpoint.get().getAddress()`). After then, we also need to 
check whether the ssl is enabled and add `http/https` protocol. I think it is 
what we have done in `HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.getWebMonitorAddress`.
   
   Moreover, I do not think we are retrieving the web monitor's address. It is 
more like to construct the address in a specific schema(aka 
protocol://address:port). The retrieval process has already been done in the 
`flinkKubeClient.getRestEndpoint`.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to