[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aitozi updated FLINK-20830:
---------------------------
    Description: Now we can choose ClusterIP or NodePort or LoadBalancer as 
rest service type. But in our internal kubernetes cluster, there is no 
kube-proxy, and ClusterIP mode rely on kube-proxy. So I think can we support 
another type of HEADLESS_CLUSTER_IP to directly talk to jobmanager pod? cc 
[~fly_in_gis]  (was: Now we can choose ClusterIP or NodePort or LoadBalancer as 
rest service type. But in our internal kubernetes cluster, there is no 
kube-proxy, and ClusterIP mode rely on kube-proxy. So I think we can support 
another type of HEADLESS_CLUSTER_IP to directly talk to jobmanager pod, what's 
your suggestion? cc [~fly_in_gis])

> Add a type of HEADLESS_CLUSTER_IP for rest service type
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-20830
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20830
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Deployment / Kubernetes
>            Reporter: Aitozi
>            Priority: Major
>
> Now we can choose ClusterIP or NodePort or LoadBalancer as rest service type. 
> But in our internal kubernetes cluster, there is no kube-proxy, and ClusterIP 
> mode rely on kube-proxy. So I think can we support another type of 
> HEADLESS_CLUSTER_IP to directly talk to jobmanager pod? cc [~fly_in_gis]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to