[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17211710#comment-17211710
 ] 

Kostas Kloudas edited comment on FLINK-19358 at 10/10/20, 2:08 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

[~fly_in_gis] I agree with you that for single-execute applications, relying on 
the {{JobGraphStore}} and not having a fixed job id seems to be a solution and 
I had the same thought when working on the Application Mode. The pre-existing 
per-job implementations used to do it so I went with it. Maybe [~trohrmann] has 
the reason why this was not done before. 

For multi-execute applications (if we want to support them in the future with 
HA) I am not sure if this can work because we may have some job graphs in the 
application that were finished for example before the job manager failure. But 
I need to think this a bit more.

For adding the cluster-id always to the {{state.checkpoints.dir}}, I think this 
can work. 

[~trohrmann] For the {{execute()}} with JobId solution, we can have a 
"verification step" in the {{executeAsync()}} where we check if the user has 
set the JobId against the specified {{executor}}.


was (Author: kkl0u):
[~fly_in_gis] I agree with you that for single-execute applications, relying on 
the {{JobGraphStore}} and not having a fixed job id seems to be a solution and 
I had the same thought when working on the Application Mode. The pre-existing 
per-job implementations used to do it so I went with it. Maybe [~trohrmann] has 
the reason why this was not done before. 

For multi-execute applications (if we want to support them in the future with 
HA) I am not sure if this can work because we need to further map retrieved 
JobIds to job graphs and we may have job graphs that were finished for example. 
But I think I need to think this a bit more.

For adding the cluster-id always to the {{state.checkpoints.dir}}, I think this 
can work. 

[~trohrmann] For the {{execute()}} with JobId solution, we can have a 
"verification step" in the {{executeAsync()}} where we check if the user has 
set the JobId against the specified {{executor}}.

> when submit job on application mode with HA,the jobid will be 0000000000
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-19358
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19358
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Deployment / YARN
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Jun Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: usability
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> when submit a flink job on application mode with HA ,the flink job id will beĀ 
> 00000000000000000000000000000000, when I have many jobs ,they have the same 
> job id , it will be lead to a checkpoint error



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to