echauchot commented on a change in pull request #13040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13040#discussion_r494178724
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/ZooKeeperCompletedCheckpointStoreITCase.java
##########
@@ -283,6 +286,54 @@ public void testConcurrentCheckpointOperations() throws
Exception {
recoveredTestCheckpoint.awaitDiscard();
}
+ /**
+ * FLINK-17073 tests that there is no request triggered when there are
too many checkpoints
+ * waiting to clean and that it resumes when the number of waiting
checkpoints as gone below
+ * the threshold.
+ *
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testChekpointingPausesAndResumeWhenTooManyCheckpoints()
throws Exception{
+ ManualClock clock = new ManualClock();
+ clock.advanceTime(1, TimeUnit.DAYS);
+ int maxCleaningCheckpoints = 1;
+ CheckpointsCleaner checkpointsCleaner = new
CheckpointsCleaner();
+ CheckpointRequestDecider checkpointRequestDecider = new
CheckpointRequestDecider(maxCleaningCheckpoints, unused ->{}, clock, 1, new
AtomicInteger(0)::get, checkpointsCleaner::getNumberOfCheckpointsToClean);
+
+ final int maxCheckpointsToRetain = 1;
+ Executors.PausableThreadPoolExecutor executor =
Executors.pausableExecutor();
+ ZooKeeperCompletedCheckpointStore checkpointStore =
createCompletedCheckpoints(maxCheckpointsToRetain, executor);
+
+ //pause the executor to pause checkpoints cleaning, to allow
assertions
+ executor.pause();
+
+ int nbCheckpointsToInject = 3;
+ for (int i = 1; i <= nbCheckpointsToInject; i++) {
+ // add checkpoints to clean
+ TestCompletedCheckpoint completedCheckpoint = new
TestCompletedCheckpoint(new JobID(), i,
+ i, Collections.emptyMap(),
CheckpointProperties.forCheckpoint(CheckpointRetentionPolicy.RETAIN_ON_FAILURE),
+ checkpointsCleaner::cleanCheckpoint);
+ checkpointStore.addCheckpoint(completedCheckpoint);
+ }
+
+ Thread.sleep(100L); // give time to submit checkpoints for
cleaning
+
+ int nbCheckpointsSubmittedForCleaningByCheckpointStore =
nbCheckpointsToInject - maxCheckpointsToRetain;
+
assertEquals(nbCheckpointsSubmittedForCleaningByCheckpointStore,
checkpointsCleaner.getNumberOfCheckpointsToClean());
Review comment:
For 1. you're right, my bad, `nbCheckpointsSubmittedForCleaning == 2` so
`CountDownLatch(1)` is not correct. +1 on `triggerAll`
For 2. true
For 3. it is just an extend with 2 overrides it does not seem a big deal to
me. Moreover, this new class is only in scope test.
Still I don't like looping on the condition that we are actually testing
(the count of cleaning CP). IMHO, failing with a timeout if the tested count is
incorrect is misleading and makes the build longer so IMHO it is not
acceptable.
I'll try to find a better way to sync the executor and the test rather than
the CountDownLatch.
PS: I resolved the discussion by mistake. I just unresolved it.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
