[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aljoscha Krettek closed FLINK-5479.
-----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.11.0
         Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
       Resolution: Fixed

This is fixed by FLIP-126 and the introduction of an idleness watermark 
strategy in the {{WatermarkStrategies}} helper.

> Per-partition watermarks in FlinkKafkaConsumer should consider idle partitions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5479
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connectors / Kafka
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> Reported in ML: 
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Kafka-topic-partition-skewness-causes-watermark-not-being-emitted-td11008.html
> Similar to what's happening to idle sources blocking watermark progression in 
> downstream operators (see FLINK-5017), the per-partition watermark mechanism 
> in {{FlinkKafkaConsumer}} is also being blocked of progressing watermarks 
> when a partition is idle. The watermark of idle partitions is always 
> {{Long.MIN_VALUE}}, therefore the overall min watermark across all partitions 
> of a consumer subtask will never proceed.
> It's normally not a common case to have Kafka partitions not producing any 
> data, but it'll probably be good to handle this as well. I think we should 
> have a localized solution similar to FLINK-5017 for the per-partition 
> watermarks in {{AbstractFetcher}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to