[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17111903#comment-17111903
]
Kostas Kloudas commented on FLINK-17745:
----------------------------------------
[~Echo Lee] Is it ok if we open a discussion in the ML to see also what other
members of the community have to say about it?
As you also mentioned, this way of submission has some problems related to
redundant transfers and it is (so far) a hidden way of submitting jobs.
> PackagedProgram' extractedTempLibraries and jarfiles may be duplicate
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17745
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17745
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client / Job Submission
> Reporter: Echo Lee
> Assignee: Kostas Kloudas
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> When i submit a flink app with a fat jar, PackagedProgram will extracted temp
> libraries by the fat jar, and add to pipeline.jars, and the pipeline.jars
> contains fat jar and temp libraries. I don't think we should add fat jar to
> the pipeline.jars if extractedTempLibraries is not empty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
