[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17084135#comment-17084135
 ] 

Wenlong Lyu commented on FLINK-17012:
-------------------------------------

Treating initialization as part of deploying is also a reasonable idea.
How about we continue FLINK-1474: add an `initialize()` in AbstractInvokable 
and call initialize in task before task transfer to running? Currently there 
are similar functionalities in both StreamTask and BatchTask: 
StreamTask#beforeInvoke and BatchTask#initialize which is called in invoke(), 
the different is that; there are some common initialization in BatchTask#invoke 
instead of  BatchTask#initialize. we may need a bit more refactor for BatchTask

> Expose stage of task initialization
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17012
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17012
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Metrics, Runtime / Task
>            Reporter: Wenlong Lyu
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently a task switches to running before fully initialized, does not take 
> state initialization and operator initialization(#open ) in to account, which 
> may take long time to finish. As a result, there would be a weird phenomenon 
> that all tasks are running but throughput is 0. 
> I think it could be good if we can expose the initialization stage of tasks. 
> What to you think?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to