Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1386#issuecomment-161449824
Yes. I was planning to start working on that after this. Since it's
preferable to fix different jiras in different commits, it'd be good if I
can base my work after this is committed. What do you think?
On Dec 2, 2015 6:39 PM, "Stephan Ewen" <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> This generally looks good and pretty straight forward.
> As such it is actually good to merge.
>
> I remember that a while back, we were discussing to create a TaskInfo
> object that would contain "subtaskIndex", "parallelism", "name",
> "name-with-subtask", "attempt", "vertex id", "attempt id", etc...
> Having such an object would allow to pass all these elements simply from
> the TaskDeploymentDescriptor to the Task to the RuntimeContext. And
> whenever we add another field, we need not propagate it manually through
> all the functions calls, but simply add it to the TaskInfo.
>
> What do you think?
>
> â
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1386#issuecomment-161286037>.
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
