[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17023164#comment-17023164
 ] 

Kostas Kloudas edited comment on FLINK-2646 at 1/24/20 6:37 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

For [~sewen]'s comment, I totally agree that now one method is enough. In the 
FLIP I mention 2 methods ({{prepareToShutdown}} and {{shutdown}}) because as 
mention in the "Assumption" block, we assume that for batch we do not have 
checkpointing. The FLIP was written some time ago and Flink has evolved quite 
much since then and the plans for {{DataStream}} subsuming {{DataSet}} have 
become more concrete. If we have checkpointing, then there seems to be no 
reason for a separate method and {{shutdown()}} or {{endOfStream()}} seems 
enough.


was (Author: kkl0u):
For [~sewen]'s comment, I totally agree that now one method is enough. In the 
FLIP I mention 2 methods because as mentioned in the "Assumption" block, we 
assume that for batch we do have checkpointing. The FLIP was written some time 
ago and Flink has evolved quiet much since then. If we have checkpointing, then 
there seems to be no reason for a separate method and {{shutdown()}} or 
{{endOfStream()}} seems enough.

> User functions should be able to differentiate between successful close and 
> erroneous close
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2646
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2646
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API / DataStream
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.0
>            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>            Assignee: Kostas Kloudas
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: usability
>
> Right now, the {{close()}} method of rich functions is invoked in case of 
> proper completion, and in case of canceling in case of error (to allow for 
> cleanup).
> In certain cases, the user function needs to know why it is closed, whether 
> the task completed in a regular fashion, or was canceled/failed.
> I suggest to add a method {{closeAfterFailure()}} to the {{RichFunction}}. By 
> default, this method calls {{close()}}. The runtime is the changed to call 
> {{close()}} as part of the regular execution and {{closeAfterFailure()}} in 
> case of an irregular exit.
> Because by default all cases call {{close()}} the change would not be API 
> breaking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to