xintongsong opened a new pull request #10834: [FLINK-15530][dist] Replace 
process memory with flink memory for TMs in default flink-conf.yaml
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10834
 
 
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This PR replaces `taskmanager.memory.process.size` with 
`taskmanager.memory.flink.size` for the default `flink-conf.yaml`.
   
   It also resolves several yarn deployment problems of using  
`taskmanager.memory.flink.size`.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - 1c542f583070354ec7eed451653ba86fa14561f1: Disable max vcore validation 
test cases.
     - These test cases should have failed already, but is covered by cluster 
specification memory validation failures.
     - This PR removes the cluster specification memory validation and uncovers 
the problems.
     - We will create separate issues to track the disabled test cases.
   - 642fcbe8fe13b14c8da0e9a5acf1d5c99c617314: Remove `ClusterSpecification` 
memory validation.
     - The validation is already covered by generating 
`TaskExecutorResourceSpec` in `AbstractContainerizedClusterClientFactory`.
     - `ClusterSpecification` stores TM memory in MB. The accuracy loss may 
cause false negative validation failures, especially when process memory is 
derived from flink memory and is not a integer value of MB.
   - 96f3e7956b3ac28c96afed20e45bca34cd7ea56e: Hotfix for removing unused env 
keys.
   - 294dae71fc791d88801810d178aef13cbdb02649: Hotfix for removing unused 
`numberOfTaskManagers`.
   - 14a36328ad3a42d8a15a4797baf7b33107f16160: Hotfix for removing unnecessary 
overwriting configuration with `ClusterSpecification`.
     - The `ClusterSpecification` is generated from configuration at the first 
place.
   - 1edb31fe2aa2466c3cae6119c799be03bf30ed1f: Unset configured flink size if 
process size is specified via client options `-tm`.
   - 78ce3aaf9f756bb27b20e1f51ff57d0ff4143b75: Replace process memory with 
flink memory in default `flink-conf.yaml`.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
     - The serializers: (no)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes)
     - The S3 file system connector: (no)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to