[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17013414#comment-17013414
 ] 

Yangze Guo commented on FLINK-15549:
------------------------------------

Hi, [~caojian0613]. Thanks for your effort:). I'll try to find a committer take 
over this ticket.

However, as the [Contributing 
guide|https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html#create-jira-ticket-and-reach-consensus]
 says, I think you'd better wait for a committer to assign this ticket to you 
before starting your work next time. Because we need to get a consensus before 
taking any effort. Thanks~


cc [~trohrmann][~gjy]

> integer overflow in SpillingResettableMutableObjectIterator
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-15549
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15549
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Task
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.0
>            Reporter: caojian0613
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: overflow
>
> The SpillingResettableMutableObjectIterator has a data overflow problem if 
> the number of elements in a single input exceeds Integer.MAX_VALUE.
> The reason is inside the SpillingResettableMutableObjectIterator, it track 
> the total number of elements and the number of elements currently read with 
> two int type fileds (elementCount and currentElementNum), and if the number 
> of elements exceeds Integer.MAX_VALUE, it will overflow.
> If there is an overflow, then in the next iteration, after reset the input , 
> the data will not be read or only part of the data will be read.
> Therefore, we should changing the type of these two fields of 
> SpillingResettableIterator* from int to long, and we also need a pre-check 
> mechanism before such numerical.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to