[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14948236#comment-14948236
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2156:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1234#issuecomment-146449913
FlinkML uses scalatest to run its tests. Scalatest didn't use the fork
number and simply executed all tests sequentially. This shouldn't be a big
problem, because there are only few tests to run.
On Oct 7, 2015 9:13 PM, "Stephan Ewen" <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> We do execute multiple tests concurrently (multiple forks). Does this lead
> to problems when all forks see the fork number "1" ? I am wondering,
> because at some places, we use the fork number to prevent port conflicts.
>
> Then again, how could these parts have worked before when the fork number
> was missing in the first place?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1234#issuecomment-146299251>.
>
> Scala modules cannot create logging file
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2156
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2156
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 0.10
> Reporter: Till Rohrmann
> Labels: starter
> Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> The Scala only modules {{flink-scala-shell}} and {{flink-ml}} use Maven's
> scalatest plugin to run their tests. The scalatest plugin has no
> {{forkNumber}}, though. Therefore, the logging fails to create the logging
> file as specified in the {{log4j-travis.properties}} file.
> We can fix this issue by giving these two modules different
> {{log4j.properties}} files which don't require a {{forkNumber}}. Or we fix
> the {{forkNumber}} to 1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
