[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16845862#comment-16845862
 ] 

vinoyang commented on FLINK-8871:
---------------------------------

OK, sorry, agree with [~till.rohrmann] 's opinion, my thought is also waiting 
for the pre-work to be completed, and then we could discuss the improvement. 
Before assigning this issue to me, I should explain my intentions or designs or 
ideas more clearly. This is where I should improve. Sorry about that.

> Checkpoint cancellation is not propagated to stop checkpointing threads on 
> the task manager
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8871
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8871
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.2, 1.4.1, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Stefan Richter
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Flink currently lacks any form of feedback mechanism from the job manager / 
> checkpoint coordinator to the tasks when it comes to failing a checkpoint. 
> This means that running snapshots on the tasks are also not stopped even if 
> their owning checkpoint is already cancelled. Two examples for cases where 
> this applies are checkpoint timeouts and local checkpoint failures on a task 
> together with a configuration that does not fail tasks on checkpoint failure. 
> Notice that those running snapshots do no longer account for the maximum 
> number of parallel checkpoints, because their owning checkpoint is considered 
> as cancelled.
> Not stopping the task's snapshot thread can lead to a problematic situation 
> where the next checkpoints already started, while the abandoned checkpoint 
> thread from a previous checkpoint is still lingering around running. This 
> scenario can potentially cascade: many parallel checkpoints will slow down 
> checkpointing and make timeouts even more likely.
>  
> A possible solution is introducing a {{cancelCheckpoint}} method  as 
> counterpart to the {{triggerCheckpoint}} method in the task manager gateway, 
> which is invoked by the checkpoint coordinator as part of cancelling the 
> checkpoint.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to