[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

godfrey he updated FLINK-12575:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
{{Exchange}} and {{Sort}} is the most heavy operator, they are created in 
{{FlinkExpandConversionRule}} when some operators require its inputs to satisfy 
distribution trait or collation trait in planner rules. However, many operators 
could provide distribution or collation, e.g. {{BatchExecHashAggregate}} or 
{{BatchExecHashJoin}} could provide distribution on its shuffle keys, 
{{BatchExecSortMergeJoin}} could provide distribution and collation on its join 
keys. If the provided traits could satisfy the required traits, the 
{{Exchange}} or the {{Sort}} is redundant.
e.g. 
{code:sql}
schema:
x: a int, b bigint, c varchar
y: d int, e bigint, f varchar
t1: a1 int, b1 bigint, c1 varchar
t2: d1 int, e1 bigint, f1 varchar

sql:
select * from x join y on a = d and b = e join t1 on d = a1 and e = b1 left 
outer join t2 on a1 = d1 and b1 = e1

the physical plan after redundant Exchange and Sort are removed:
SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(a1, d1), =(b1, e1))], 
leftSorted=[true], ...)
:- SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(d, a1), =(e, b1))], 
leftSorted=[true], ...)
:  :- SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(a, d), =(b, e))], ...)
:  :  :- Exchange(distribution=[hash[a, b]])
:  :  :  +- TableSourceScan(table=[[x]], ...)
:  :  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[d, e]])
:  :     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[y]], ...)
:  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[a1, b1]])
:     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[t1]], ...)
+- Exchange(distribution=[hash[d1, e1]])
   +- TableSourceScan(table=[[t2]], ...)
{code}

In above physical plan, the Exchanges between SortMergeJoins are redundant due 
to their shuffle keys are same, the Sorts in the top two SortMergeJoins' left 
hand side are redundant due to its input is sorted.

another situation is the shuffle and collation could be removed between 
multiple {{Over}} s. e.g.
{code:sql}
schema:
MyTable: a int, b int, c varchar

sql:
SELECT
    COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY a),
    SUM(a) OVER (PARTITION BY b ORDER BY a),
    RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY a, c),
    SUM(a) OVER (PARTITION BY b ORDER BY a),
    COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY c)
 FROM MyTable

the physical plan after redundant Exchange and Sort are removed:
Calc(select=[...])
+- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[c], orderBy=[c ASC], window#0=[COUNT(*)  ...])
   +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[c], orderBy=[a ASC], window#0=[COUNT(*) ...], 
window#1=[RANK(*) ...], ...)
      +- Sort(orderBy=[c ASC, a ASC])
         +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[c]])
            +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[b], orderBy=[a ASC], 
window#0=[COUNT(a), $SUM0(a) ...], ...)
               +- Sort(orderBy=[b ASC, a ASC])
                  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[b]])
                     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[MyTable]], ...)
{code}
the {{Exchange}} and {{Sort}} between the top two OverAggregates are redundant 
due to their shuffle keys and sort keys are same.

  was:
{{Exchange}} and {{Sort}} is the most heavy operator, they are created in 
{{FlinkExpandConversionRule}} when some operators require its inputs to satisfy 
distribution trait or collation trait in planner rules. However, many operators 
could provide distribution or collation, e.g. {{BatchExecHashAggregate}} or 
{{BatchExecHashJoin}} could provide distribution on its shuffle keys, 
{{BatchExecSortMergeJoin}} could provide distribution and collation on its join 
keys. If the provided traits could satisfy the required traits, the 
{{Exchange}} or the {{Sort}} is redundant.
e.g. 
{code:sql}
schema:
x: a int, b bigint, c varchar
y: d int, e bigint, f varchar
t1: a1 int, b1 bigint, c1 varchar
t2: d1 int, e1 bigint, f1 varchar

sql:
select * from x join y on a = d and b = e join t1 on d = a1 and e = b1 left 
outer join t2 on a1 = d1 and b1 = e1

the physical plan after redundant Exchange and Sort are removed:
SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(a1, d1), =(b1, e1))], 
leftSorted=[true], ...)
:- SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(d, a1), =(e, b1))], 
leftSorted=[true], ...)
:  :- SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(a, d), =(b, e))], ...)
:  :  :- Exchange(distribution=[hash[a, b]])
:  :  :  +- TableSourceScan(table=[[x]], ...)
:  :  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[d, e]])
:  :     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[y]], ...)
:  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[a1, b1]])
:     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[t1]], ...)
+- Exchange(distribution=[hash[d1, e1]])
   +- TableSourceScan(table=[[t2]], ...)
{code}

In above physical plan, the Exchanges between SortMergeJoins are redundant due 
to their shuffle keys are same, the Sorts in the top tow SortMergeJoins' left 
hand side are redundant due to its input is sorted.

another situation is the shuffle and collation could be removed between 
multiple {{Over}} s. e.g.
{code:sql}
schema:
MyTable: a int, b int, c varchar

sql:
SELECT
    COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY a),
    SUM(a) OVER (PARTITION BY b ORDER BY a),
    RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY a, c),
    SUM(a) OVER (PARTITION BY b ORDER BY a),
    COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY c)
 FROM MyTable

the physical plan after redundant Exchange and Sort are removed:
Calc(select=[...])
+- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[c], orderBy=[c ASC], window#0=[COUNT(*)  ...])
   +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[c], orderBy=[a ASC], window#0=[COUNT(*) ...], 
window#1=[RANK(*) ...], ...)
      +- Sort(orderBy=[c ASC, a ASC])
         +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[c]])
            +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[b], orderBy=[a ASC], 
window#0=[COUNT(a), $SUM0(a) ...], ...)
               +- Sort(orderBy=[b ASC, a ASC])
                  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[b]])
                     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[MyTable]], ...)
{code}
the {{Exchange}} and {{Sort}} between the top two OverAggregates are redundant 
due to their shuffle keys and sort keys are same.


> Introduce planner rules to remove redundant shuffle and collation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12575
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12575
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Table SQL / Planner
>            Reporter: godfrey he
>            Assignee: godfrey he
>            Priority: Major
>
> {{Exchange}} and {{Sort}} is the most heavy operator, they are created in 
> {{FlinkExpandConversionRule}} when some operators require its inputs to 
> satisfy distribution trait or collation trait in planner rules. However, many 
> operators could provide distribution or collation, e.g. 
> {{BatchExecHashAggregate}} or {{BatchExecHashJoin}} could provide 
> distribution on its shuffle keys, {{BatchExecSortMergeJoin}} could provide 
> distribution and collation on its join keys. If the provided traits could 
> satisfy the required traits, the {{Exchange}} or the {{Sort}} is redundant.
> e.g. 
> {code:sql}
> schema:
> x: a int, b bigint, c varchar
> y: d int, e bigint, f varchar
> t1: a1 int, b1 bigint, c1 varchar
> t2: d1 int, e1 bigint, f1 varchar
> sql:
> select * from x join y on a = d and b = e join t1 on d = a1 and e = b1 left 
> outer join t2 on a1 = d1 and b1 = e1
> the physical plan after redundant Exchange and Sort are removed:
> SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(a1, d1), =(b1, e1))], 
> leftSorted=[true], ...)
> :- SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(d, a1), =(e, b1))], 
> leftSorted=[true], ...)
> :  :- SortMergeJoin(joinType=[...], where=[AND(=(a, d), =(b, e))], ...)
> :  :  :- Exchange(distribution=[hash[a, b]])
> :  :  :  +- TableSourceScan(table=[[x]], ...)
> :  :  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[d, e]])
> :  :     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[y]], ...)
> :  +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[a1, b1]])
> :     +- TableSourceScan(table=[[t1]], ...)
> +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[d1, e1]])
>    +- TableSourceScan(table=[[t2]], ...)
> {code}
> In above physical plan, the Exchanges between SortMergeJoins are redundant 
> due to their shuffle keys are same, the Sorts in the top two SortMergeJoins' 
> left hand side are redundant due to its input is sorted.
> another situation is the shuffle and collation could be removed between 
> multiple {{Over}} s. e.g.
> {code:sql}
> schema:
> MyTable: a int, b int, c varchar
> sql:
> SELECT
>     COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY a),
>     SUM(a) OVER (PARTITION BY b ORDER BY a),
>     RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY a, c),
>     SUM(a) OVER (PARTITION BY b ORDER BY a),
>     COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY c)
>  FROM MyTable
> the physical plan after redundant Exchange and Sort are removed:
> Calc(select=[...])
> +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[c], orderBy=[c ASC], window#0=[COUNT(*)  ...])
>    +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[c], orderBy=[a ASC], window#0=[COUNT(*) 
> ...], window#1=[RANK(*) ...], ...)
>       +- Sort(orderBy=[c ASC, a ASC])
>          +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[c]])
>             +- OverAggregate(partitionBy=[b], orderBy=[a ASC], 
> window#0=[COUNT(a), $SUM0(a) ...], ...)
>                +- Sort(orderBy=[b ASC, a ASC])
>                   +- Exchange(distribution=[hash[b]])
>                      +- TableSourceScan(table=[[MyTable]], ...)
> {code}
> the {{Exchange}} and {{Sort}} between the top two OverAggregates are 
> redundant due to their shuffle keys and sort keys are same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to