twalthr commented on a change in pull request #7664: [FLINK-11449][table] 
Uncouple the Expression class from RexNodes.
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7664#discussion_r255065688
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/BatchTableEnvironment.scala
 ##########
 @@ -414,15 +414,15 @@ abstract class BatchTableEnvironment(
     * @tparam T The type of the [[DataSet]].
     */
   protected def registerDataSetInternal[T](
-      name: String, dataSet: DataSet[T], fields: Array[Expression]): Unit = {
+      name: String, dataSet: DataSet[T], fields: Array[PlannerExpression]): 
Unit = {
 
 Review comment:
   If `PlannerExpression` would implement the `Expression` interface, we would 
not need these big refactorings.
   
   This also makes sense because a `PlannerExpression` is just a special kind 
of expression, right?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to