[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16695753#comment-16695753
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10845:
----------------------------------------

twalthr commented on a change in pull request #7079: [FLINK-10845][table] 
Support multiple different DISTINCT aggregates for batch
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7079#discussion_r235670192
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/codegen/calls/ScalarOperators.scala
 ##########
 @@ -1288,7 +1295,8 @@ object ScalarOperators {
       nullCheck: Boolean,
       resultType: TypeInformation[_],
       left: GeneratedExpression,
-      right: GeneratedExpression)
+      right: GeneratedExpression,
+      compareNull: Boolean)
 
 Review comment:
   @xueyumusic After looking at the amount of changes, I would suggest to leave 
`generateOperatorIfNotNull` untouched. This method is correct as it is. If you 
need some special null comparing logic. We can create a specialized method only 
for `equals`. We could create a method `generateDistinctFrom` that wraps 
`generateEquals`. What do you think?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Support DISTINCT aggregates for batch
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10845
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Timo Walther
>            Assignee: xueyu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Currently, we support distinct aggregates for streaming. However, executing 
> the same query on batch like the following test:
> {code}
>     val env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment
>     val tEnv = TableEnvironment.getTableEnvironment(env)
>     val sqlQuery =
>       "SELECT b, " +
>       "  SUM(DISTINCT (a / 3)), " +
>       "  COUNT(DISTINCT SUBSTRING(c FROM 1 FOR 2))," +
>       "  COUNT(DISTINCT c) " +
>       "FROM MyTable " +
>       "GROUP BY b"
>     val data = new mutable.MutableList[(Int, Long, String)]
>     data.+=((1, 1L, "Hi"))
>     data.+=((2, 2L, "Hello"))
>     data.+=((3, 2L, "Hello world"))
>     data.+=((4, 3L, "Hello world, how are you?"))
>     data.+=((5, 3L, "I am fine."))
>     data.+=((6, 3L, "Luke Skywalker"))
>     data.+=((7, 4L, "Comment#1"))
>     data.+=((8, 4L, "Comment#2"))
>     data.+=((9, 4L, "Comment#3"))
>     data.+=((10, 4L, "Comment#4"))
>     data.+=((11, 5L, "Comment#5"))
>     data.+=((12, 5L, "Comment#6"))
>     data.+=((13, 5L, "Comment#7"))
>     data.+=((14, 5L, "Comment#8"))
>     data.+=((15, 5L, "Comment#9"))
>     data.+=((16, 6L, "Comment#10"))
>     data.+=((17, 6L, "Comment#11"))
>     data.+=((18, 6L, "Comment#12"))
>     data.+=((19, 6L, "Comment#13"))
>     data.+=((20, 6L, "Comment#14"))
>     data.+=((21, 6L, "Comment#15"))
>     val t = env.fromCollection(data).toTable(tEnv).as('a, 'b, 'c)
>     tEnv.registerTable("MyTable", t)
>     tEnv.sqlQuery(sqlQuery).toDataSet[Row].print()
> {code}
> Fails with:
> {code}
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenException: Unsupported call: IS NOT 
> DISTINCT FROM 
> If you think this function should be supported, you can create an issue and 
> start a discussion for it.
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator$$anonfun$visitCall$3.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:1027)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator$$anonfun$visitCall$3.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:1027)
>       at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:121)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator.visitCall(CodeGenerator.scala:1027)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator.visitCall(CodeGenerator.scala:66)
>       at org.apache.calcite.rex.RexCall.accept(RexCall.java:107)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.codegen.CodeGenerator.generateExpression(CodeGenerator.scala:247)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetJoin.addInnerJoin(DataSetJoin.scala:221)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetJoin.translateToPlan(DataSetJoin.scala:170)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetCalc.translateToPlan(DataSetCalc.scala:91)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetJoin.translateToPlan(DataSetJoin.scala:165)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.plan.nodes.dataset.DataSetCalc.translateToPlan(DataSetCalc.scala:91)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.api.BatchTableEnvironment.translate(BatchTableEnvironment.scala:498)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.api.BatchTableEnvironment.translate(BatchTableEnvironment.scala:476)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.api.scala.BatchTableEnvironment.toDataSet(BatchTableEnvironment.scala:141)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.api.scala.TableConversions.toDataSet(TableConversions.scala:50)
>       at 
> org.apache.flink.table.runtime.stream.sql.SqlITCase.testDistinctGroupBy(SqlITCase.scala:2
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to