[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Bowen Li updated FLINK-10686: ----------------------------- Comment: was deleted (was: How about parallelize the subtasks of FLINK-10688 and FLINK-10689? Given that FLINK-10687 is done and {{flink-table-common}} is created, rather than waiting for FLINK-10688 and being blocked, I think a better way to make progress is: * finish this subtask first by porting {{org.apache.flink.table.catalog}} and {{org.apache.flink.table.functions}} to {{flink-table-common}} * let {{flink-connectors}} temporarily depends on both {{flink-table}} and {{flink-table-common}} * As part of FLINK-10688, we can remove {{flink-connectors}} 's dependency on {{flink-table}} then. The reasons being that the community is starting to work on Flink-Hive integration and external catalogs. Since we've already decided to move UDFs/catalogs APIs to Java, I don't think writing new scala code then porting to Java is cumbersome and time-consuming is a good option. I'd rather port existing code to Java first and then start to write all new code/feature. With the way I proposed, we can parallelize the work and FLINK-10689 won't get blocked by FLINK-10688. What do you think? [~twalthr]) > Introduce a flink-table-common module > ------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-10686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10686 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table API & SQL > Affects Versions: 1.7.0 > Reporter: Timo Walther > Assignee: Timo Walther > Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.8.0 > > > Because more and more table factories for connectors and formats are added > and external catalog support is also on the horizon, {{flink-table}} becomes > a dependency for many Flink modules. Since {{flink-table}} is implemented in > Scala it requires other modules to be suffixes with Scala prefixes. However, > as we have learned in the past, Scala code is hard to maintain which is why > our long-term goal is to avoid Scala/Scala dependencies. > Therefore we propose a new module {{flink-table-common}} that contains > interfaces between {{flink-table}} and other modules. This module is > implemented in Java and should contain minimal (or better no) external > dependencies. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)