[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16668543#comment-16668543
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10074:
----------------------------------------

azagrebin commented on issue #6567: [FLINK-10074] Allowable number of 
checkpoint failures
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6567#issuecomment-434255898
 
 
   I created FLINK-10724 to refactor failure handling in checkpoint coordinator 
where I believe we should firstly prepare it for better integration with the 
error counter we have in this PR. Once we resolve FLINK-10724, we can reopen 
this PR or open another one and rebase the error counter on the result of 
FLINK-10724 which should be simpler then.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Allowable number of checkpoint failures 
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10074
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10074
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Thomas Weise
>            Assignee: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> For intermittent checkpoint failures it is desirable to have a mechanism to 
> avoid restarts. If, for example, a transient S3 error prevents checkpoint 
> completion, the next checkpoint may very well succeed. The user may wish to 
> not incur the expense of restart under such scenario and this could be 
> expressed with a failure threshold (number of subsequent checkpoint 
> failures), possibly combined with a list of exceptions to tolerate.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to