[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16663428#comment-16663428
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10490:
----------------------------------------
zentol commented on issue #6910: [FLINK-10490][tests] OperatorSnapshotUtil
should use SavepointV2Seria…
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6910#issuecomment-432960338
ah, right. Well it looks like all methods referenced in this PR are mostly
identical between both serializers; the only difference seems to be that the in
the v1 serializer `deserializeKeyedStateHandle()` does not have a branch for
incremental key-group handles.
Sooo...I guess we were lucky?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> OperatorSnapshotUtil should probably use SavepointV2Serializer
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10490
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0
> Reporter: Stefan Richter
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {{OperatorSnapshotUtil}} is used for testing savepoint migration. This
> utility internally still uses {{SavepointV1Serializer}} and I would assume
> that it should use {{SavepointV2Serializer}}. I wonder if that means that
> some newer cases are actually not covered in the migration tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
