tzulitai commented on a change in pull request #6875: [FLINK-9808] [state 
backends] Migrate state when necessary in state backends
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6875#discussion_r226911048
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-state-backends/flink-statebackend-rocksdb/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/contrib/streaming/state/RocksDBKeyedStateBackend.java
 ##########
 @@ -1389,6 +1388,149 @@ private void copyStateDataHandleData(
                return Tuple2.of(stateInfo.f0, newMetaInfo);
        }
 
+       private <N, S extends State, SV> 
RegisteredKeyValueStateBackendMetaInfo<N, SV> migrateStateIfNecessary(
+                       StateDescriptor<S, SV> stateDesc,
+                       TypeSerializer<N> namespaceSerializer,
+                       Tuple2<ColumnFamilyHandle, RegisteredStateMetaInfoBase> 
stateInfo,
+                       @Nullable StateSnapshotTransformer<SV> 
snapshotTransformer) throws Exception {
+
+               StateMetaInfoSnapshot restoredMetaInfoSnapshot = 
restoredKvStateMetaInfos.get(stateDesc.getName());
+
+               Preconditions.checkState(
+                       restoredMetaInfoSnapshot != null,
+                       "Requested to check compatibility of a restored 
RegisteredKeyedBackendStateMetaInfo," +
+                               " but its corresponding restored snapshot 
cannot be found.");
+
+               
Preconditions.checkState(restoredMetaInfoSnapshot.getBackendStateType()
+                               == 
StateMetaInfoSnapshot.BackendStateType.KEY_VALUE,
+                       "Incompatible state types. " +
+                               "Was [" + 
restoredMetaInfoSnapshot.getBackendStateType() + "], " +
+                               "registered as [" + 
StateMetaInfoSnapshot.BackendStateType.KEY_VALUE + "].");
+
+               Preconditions.checkState(
+                       Objects.equals(stateDesc.getName(), 
restoredMetaInfoSnapshot.getName()),
+                       "Incompatible state names. " +
+                               "Was [" + restoredMetaInfoSnapshot.getName() + 
"], " +
+                               "registered with [" + stateDesc.getName() + 
"].");
+
+               final StateDescriptor.Type restoredType =
+                       StateDescriptor.Type.valueOf(
+                               restoredMetaInfoSnapshot.getOption(
+                                       
StateMetaInfoSnapshot.CommonOptionsKeys.KEYED_STATE_TYPE));
+
+               if (!Objects.equals(stateDesc.getType(), 
StateDescriptor.Type.UNKNOWN)
+                       && !Objects.equals(restoredType, 
StateDescriptor.Type.UNKNOWN)) {
+
+                       Preconditions.checkState(
+                               stateDesc.getType() == restoredType,
+                               "Incompatible key/value state types. " +
+                                       "Was [" + restoredType + "], " +
+                                       "registered with [" + 
stateDesc.getType() + "].");
+               }
+
+               TypeSerializer<SV> stateSerializer = stateDesc.getSerializer();
+
+               RegisteredKeyValueStateBackendMetaInfo<N, SV> newMetaInfo = new 
RegisteredKeyValueStateBackendMetaInfo<>(
+                       stateDesc.getType(),
+                       stateDesc.getName(),
+                       namespaceSerializer,
+                       stateSerializer,
+                       snapshotTransformer);
+
+               CompatibilityResult<N> namespaceCompatibility = 
CompatibilityUtil.resolveCompatibilityResult(
 
 Review comment:
   Yes, this is indeed not nice. We actually have a newer replacement called 
`TypeSerializerSchemaCompatibility`. However, `CompatibilityResult` still being 
used was a consequence of not being able to fully remove the use of 
`CompatibilityResult.resolveSchemaCompatibility` without touching all the 
serializers.
   
   For this, I've also been discussing with @dawidwys that we might want to 
simply remove `CompatibilityResult` completely in favor of the newer 
`TypeSerializerSchemaCompatibilty` class. This maybe should come as a separate 
commit.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to