[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16630530#comment-16630530 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10415: ---------------------------------------- zentol commented on issue #6763: [FLINK-10415] Fail response future if connection closes in RestClient URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6763#issuecomment-425115999 urgh, well that's unfortunate. We may want to increase the idle timeout to a larger value though (maybe 5 minutes?), as it effectively is an upper limit for the timeout that a user may specify. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > RestClient does not react to lost connection > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-10415 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10415 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: REST > Affects Versions: 1.6.1, 1.7.0, 1.5.4 > Reporter: Till Rohrmann > Assignee: Till Rohrmann > Priority: Blocker > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.6.2, 1.5.5 > > > While working on FLINK-10403, I noticed that Flink's {{RestClient}} does not > seem to react to a lost connections in time. When sending a request to the > current leader it happened that the leader was killed just after establishing > the connection. Then the {{RestClient}} did not fail the connection and was > stuck in writing a request or retrieving a response from the lost leader. I'm > wondering whether we should introduce a {{ReadTimeoutHandler}} and > {{WriteTimeoutHandler}} to handle these problems. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)