[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16625665#comment-16625665
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10074:
----------------------------------------

azagrebin commented on issue #6567: [FLINK-10074] Allowable number of 
checkpoint failures
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6567#issuecomment-423942772
 
 
   > Do we need to take this refactoring into account? Because this PR is 
actually a supplement to the checkpoint exception handler.
   
   Yes, I think we can have the same semantics as in the previous only-TM 
implementation (`setFailOnCheckpointingErrors` means `tolerableFailures == 0`) 
but now everything should happen in `CheckpointCoordinator`. That is why I also 
mentioned this point:
   
   > Consider having only DecliningCheckpointExceptionHandler on TaskExecutor 
side and letting now to handle all failure cases only in CheckpointCoordinator
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Allowable number of checkpoint failures 
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10074
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10074
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Thomas Weise
>            Assignee: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> For intermittent checkpoint failures it is desirable to have a mechanism to 
> avoid restarts. If, for example, a transient S3 error prevents checkpoint 
> completion, the next checkpoint may very well succeed. The user may wish to 
> not incur the expense of restart under such scenario and this could be 
> expressed with a failure threshold (number of subsequent checkpoint 
> failures), possibly combined with a list of exceptions to tolerate.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to