[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16605551#comment-16605551
 ] 

Dominik Wosiński edited comment on FLINK-10052 at 9/6/18 9:48 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

This may be also possibly related to : 
[FLINK-5996|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5996]


was (Author: wosinsan):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5996

> Tolerate temporarily suspended ZooKeeper connections
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10052
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Distributed Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.2, 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Assignee: Dominik Wosiński
>            Priority: Major
>
> This issue results from FLINK-10011 which uncovered a problem with Flink's HA 
> recovery and proposed the following solution to harden Flink:
> The {{ZooKeeperLeaderElectionService}} uses the {{LeaderLatch}} Curator 
> recipe for leader election. The leader latch revokes leadership in case of a 
> suspended ZooKeeper connection. This can be premature in case that the system 
> can reconnect to ZooKeeper before its session expires. The effect of the lost 
> leadership is that all jobs will be canceled and directly restarted after 
> regaining the leadership.
> Instead of directly revoking the leadership upon a SUSPENDED ZooKeeper 
> connection, it would be better to wait until the ZooKeeper connection is 
> LOST. That way we would allow the system to reconnect and not lose the 
> leadership. This could be achievable by using Curator's {{LeaderSelector}} 
> instead of the {{LeaderLatch}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to