[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16578456#comment-16578456
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9739:
---------------------------------------
zentol commented on issue #6452: [FLINK-9739] Regression in supported
filesystems for RocksDB
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6452#issuecomment-412561511
When would a relative path make sense, and wouldn't this always result in
effectively random behavior?
I would be fine with dropping support for schemes; if we either reject or
ignore schemes anyway we may as well be explicit about it up-front.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Regression in supported filesystems for RocksDB
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9739
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9739
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: FileSystem, State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.6.0
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Sampath Bhat
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> A user reporter on the [mailing
> list|http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Checkpointing-in-Flink-1-5-0-tt21173.html]
> has reported that the {{RocksDBStateBackend}} no longer supports GlusterFS
> mounted volumes.
> Configuring {{file:///home/abc/share}} lead to an exception that claimed the
> path to not be absolute.
> This was working fine in 1.4.2.
> In FLINK-6557 the {{RocksDBStateBackend}} was refactored to use java
> {{Files}} instead of Flink {{Paths}}, potentially causing the issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
