[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16536052#comment-16536052
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9377:
---------------------------------------

Github user yanghua commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6273
  
    conflicts, please update the PR~


> Remove writing serializers as part of the checkpoint meta information
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9377
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> When writing meta information of a state in savepoints, we currently write 
> both the state serializer as well as the state serializer's configuration 
> snapshot.
> Writing both is actually redundant, as most of the time they have identical 
> information.
>  Moreover, the fact that we use Java serialization to write the serializer 
> and rely on it to be re-readable on the restore run, already poses problems 
> for serializers such as the {{AvroSerializer}} (see discussion in FLINK-9202) 
> to perform even a compatible upgrade.
> The proposal here is to leave only the config snapshot as meta information, 
> and use that as the single source of truth of information about the schema of 
> serialized state.
>  The config snapshot should be treated as a factory (or provided to a 
> factory) to re-create serializers capable of reading old, serialized state.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to