[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Till Rohrmann resolved FLINK-8801. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fixed via master: c90a757b29f168144b1bae99df532911ae682e63 1.5.0: 071dedcb769d1e3e899134e9566c69808ba99c53 1.4.3: 8b1376b1808d302574073ce180dc561244adc6f5 > S3's eventual consistent read-after-write may fail yarn deployment of > resources to S3 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-8801 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8801 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: FileSystem, ResourceManager, YARN > Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0 > Reporter: Nico Kruber > Assignee: Nico Kruber > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.3 > > > According to > https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/Introduction.html#ConsistencyModel: > {quote} > Amazon S3 provides read-after-write consistency for PUTS of new objects in > your S3 bucket in all regions with one caveat. The caveat is that if you make > a HEAD or GET request to the key name (to find if the object exists) before > creating the object, Amazon S3 provides eventual consistency for > read-after-write. > {quote} > Some S3 file system implementations may actually execute such a request for > the about-to-write object and thus the read-after-write is only eventually > consistent. {{org.apache.flink.yarn.Utils#setupLocalResource()}} currently > relies on a consistent read-after-write since it accesses the remote resource > to get file size and modification timestamp. Since there we have access to > the local resource, we can use the data from there instead and circumvent the > problem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)