[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16396373#comment-16396373 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8917: --------------------------------------- GitHub user jianran opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5686 [FLINK-8917] [Job-Submission] FlinkMiniCluster default createHighAvailabilityServices is not same as ClusterClient ## What is the purpose of the change the FlinkMiniCluster used HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.createAvailableOrEmbeddedServices to create highAvailabilityServices,so the FlinkMiniCluster's highAvailabilityServices is EmbeddedHaServices, but the ClusterClient used HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.createHighAvailabilityServices,so the so ClusterClient's highAvailabilityServices is StandaloneHaServices; the highAvailabilityServicess are different, if you use the flink-1.4 in zeppelin,the zeppelin use FlinkMiniCluster to submit job, the job submission will be failed with the follow msg: Discard message LeaderSessionMessage(00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,SubmitJob(JobGraph(jobId: 33d8e7d74aa48f76a1622d4d8f78105e),EXECUTION_RESULT_AND_STATE_CHANGES)) because the expected leader session ID 87efb7ca-b761-4977-9696-d521bc178703 did not equal the received leader session ID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000. so this pull request will to change the FlinkMiniCluster use HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.createHighAvailabilityServices to create StandaloneHaServices as same as the ClusterClient created ## Brief change log *(for example:)* - *The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact* - *Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference* - *TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache* ## Verifying this change This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. This change is already covered by existing tests, such as LocalFlinkMiniClusterITCase. ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts: - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency):no - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: no - The serializers: don't know - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): don't know - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no - The S3 file system connector:no ## Documentation - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jianran/flink release-1.4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5686.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #5686 ---- commit 4aa4e8d27f602f7dfeadc07c5b76498afb044f06 Author: jianran.tfh <jianran.tfh@...> Date: 2018-03-13T01:08:19Z [FLINK-8917] [Job-Submission] FlinkMiniCluster haService not same as ClusterClient ---- > FlinkMiniCluster default createHighAvailabilityServices is not same as > ClusterClient > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: FLINK-8917 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8917 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Job-Submission > Affects Versions: 1.4.0 > Reporter: jianran.tfh > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.4.3 > > > FlinkMiniCluster default createHighAvailabilityServices is not same as > ClusterClient, > the FlinkMiniCluster used > HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.createAvailableOrEmbeddedServices > but the ClusterClient used > HighAvailabilityServicesUtils.createHighAvailabilityServices,so if you use > the flink-1.4 in zeppelin,the job submission will be failed with the follow > msg: > Discard message > LeaderSessionMessage(00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,SubmitJob(JobGraph(jobId: > 33d8e7d74aa48f76a1622d4d8f78105e),EXECUTION_RESULT_AND_STATE_CHANGES)) > because the expected leader session ID 87efb7ca-b761-4977-9696-d521bc178703 > did not equal the received leader session ID > 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)