GitHub user sihuazhou opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5604

    [FLINK-8816][ResourceManager] Remove the oldWorker only after starting 
newWorker successfully

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    This PR address 
[FLINK-8816](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8816), We should 
remove the oldWorker only after starting newWorker successfully in 
`ResourceManager#registerTaskExecutorInternal` and javadoc for 
`SlotProvider#allocateSlot` is outdated.
    
    ## Brief change log
    
    - Fix bug `registerTaskExecutorInternal()`, remove old worker after 
starting newWorker successfully.
    - Fix javadoc for SlotProvider#allocateSlot.
    
    ## Verifying this change
    
    This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
      - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
      - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
      - The serializers: (no)
      - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
      - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes)
      - The S3 file system connector: (no)
    
    ## Documentation
        no

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/sihuazhou/flink 
fix_registerTaskExecutorInternal_bug_and_javadoc

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5604.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5604
    
----
commit 98e93adf7f006f09b9ff801d67ac801563ad9973
Author: sihuazhou <summerleafs@...>
Date:   2018-03-01T02:24:53Z

    1. Fix bug `registerTaskExecutorInternal()`, remove old worker after 
starting the newWorker successfully.
    2. Fix javadoc for SlotProvider#allocateSlot.

----


---

Reply via email to