Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/684#discussion_r32888195
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/util/FieldAccessorTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.streaming.util;
+
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.PrimitiveArrayTypeInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.BasicArrayTypeInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.tuple.Tuple2;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.TupleTypeInfo;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
+
+// This only tests a fraction of FieldAccessor. The other parts are tested
indirectly by AggregationFunctionTest.
+public class FieldAccessorTest {
+
+ @Test
+ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
+ public void arrayFieldAccessorTest() {
+ int[] a = new int[]{3,5};
+ FieldAccessor<int[], Integer> fieldAccessor =
+ (FieldAccessor<int[], Integer>) (Object)
+ FieldAccessor.create(1,
PrimitiveArrayTypeInfo.getInfoFor(a.getClass()), null);
+
+ assertEquals(Integer.class,
fieldAccessor.getFieldType().getTypeClass());
+
+ assertEquals((Integer)a[1], fieldAccessor.get(a));
+
+ a = fieldAccessor.set(a, 6);
+ assertEquals((Integer)a[1], fieldAccessor.get(a));
+
+
+
+ Integer[] b = new Integer[]{3,5};
+ FieldAccessor<Integer[], Integer> fieldAccessor2 =
+ (FieldAccessor<Integer[], Integer>) (Object)
+ FieldAccessor.create(1,
BasicArrayTypeInfo.getInfoFor(b.getClass()), null);
+
+ assertEquals(Integer.class,
fieldAccessor2.getFieldType().getTypeClass());
+
+ assertEquals((Integer)b[1], fieldAccessor2.get(b));
+
+ b = fieldAccessor2.set(b, 6);
+ assertEquals((Integer)b[1], fieldAccessor2.get(b));
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
+ public void tupleFieldAccessorOutOfBoundsTest() {
+ try {
+ FieldAccessor<Tuple2<Integer, Integer>, Integer>
fieldAccessor =
+ (FieldAccessor<Tuple2<Integer,
Integer>, Integer>) (Object)
+ FieldAccessor.create(2,
TupleTypeInfo.getBasicTupleTypeInfo(Integer.class, Integer.class),
+ null);
+ fail();
+ } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException e) {
+ // Nothing to do here
+ }
+ }
--- End diff --
Why is there no test for the POJO field accessor?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
