[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220750#comment-16220750 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7844: --------------------------------------- Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4844 Had an offline discussion with @tillrohrmann - rewriting this without Mockito results in a similar amount of code with similar maintenance effort, so seems to be okay in this case. +1 to merge after fixing the `Thread.holdsLock(lock)` comment above > Fine Grained Recovery triggers checkpoint timeout failure > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-7844 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7844 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: State Backends, Checkpointing > Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.3.2 > Reporter: Zhenzhong Xu > Assignee: Zhenzhong Xu > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > Context: > We are using "individual" failover (fine-grained) recovery strategy for our > embarrassingly parallel router use case. The topic has over 2000 partitions, > and parallelism is set to ~180 that dispatched to over 20 task managers with > around 180 slots. > Observations: > We've noticed after one task manager termination, even though the individual > recovery happens correctly, that the workload was re-dispatched to a new > available task manager instance. However, the checkpoint would take 10 mins > to eventually timeout, causing all other task managers not able to commit > checkpoints. In a worst-case scenario, if job got restarted for other reasons > (i.e. job manager termination), that would cause more messages to be > re-processed/duplicates compared to the job without fine-grained recovery > enabled. > I am suspecting that uber checkpoint was waiting for a previous checkpoint > that initiated by the old task manager and thus taking a long time to time > out. > Two questions: > 1. Is there a configuration that controls this checkpoint timeout? > 2. Is there any reason that when Job Manager realizes that Task Manager is > gone and workload is redispatched, it still need to wait for the checkpoint > initiated by the old task manager? > Checkpoint screenshot in attachments. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)