GitHub user bowenli86 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4786

    [FLINK-7388][DataStream API] ProcessFunction.onTimer() sets processing time 
as timestamp

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    Before Flink 1.4.0, when called from a processing-time timer, the 
`ProcessFunction.onTimer()` method sets the current processing time as 
event-time timestamp. This behavior is very subtle and might not be noticed by 
users.
    
    Well, it's harmful because processing-time timestamps are indeterministic 
and not aligned with watermarks. Besides, user-implemented logic depends on 
this wrong timestamp highly likely is unintendedly faulty.
    
    So we've decided to fix it. Upon upgrading to 1.4.0, Flink jobs that are 
using this incorrect event-time timestamp will fail, and users should adapt 
their jobs to the correct logic.
    
    ## Brief change log
    
    - not set a timestamp for processing-time timer
    
    ## Verifying this change
    
    This change is already covered by existing tests
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
    None
    
    ## Documentation
    
      - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
      - If yes, how is the feature documented? (docs)
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/bowenli86/flink FLINK-7388

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4786.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4786
    
----
commit 1fec305efba8ad94b7d7e72a672186caaf40270e
Author: Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-10-08T22:57:51Z

    [FLINK-7388] ProcessFunction.onTimer() sets processing time as timestamp

commit 7e9afde7519381adadf222febea9640afd41fa2a
Author: Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-10-08T23:26:54Z

    add doc

----


---

Reply via email to