[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16180445#comment-16180445
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7439:
---------------------------------------
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4536#discussion_r140986388
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/plan/schema/FlinkTableFunctionImpl.scala
---
@@ -36,10 +36,8 @@ import org.apache.flink.table.calcite.FlinkTypeFactory
class FlinkTableFunctionImpl[T](
val typeInfo: TypeInformation[T],
val fieldIndexes: Array[Int],
- val fieldNames: Array[String],
- val evalMethod: Method)
- extends ReflectiveFunctionBase(evalMethod)
--- End diff --
I think we don't need `ReflectiveFunctionBase` anymore. The logic is
implemented by us now.
> Support variable arguments for UDTF in SQL
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-7439
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7439
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Jark Wu
> Assignee: Jark Wu
>
> Currently, both UDF and UDAF support variable parameters, but UDTF not.
> FLINK-5882 supports variable UDTF for Table API only, but missed SQL.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
