[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16175942#comment-16175942 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7659: --------------------------------------- GitHub user bowenli86 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4703 [FLINK-7659][REST] Unprotected access to inProgress in JobCancellationWithSavepointHandlers#handleNewRequest ## What is the purpose of the change There's a thread accessing `inProgress` without proper synchronization ## Brief change log Add synchronization to access `inProgress` ## Verifying this change This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts: ## Documentation - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/bowenli86/flink FLINK-7659 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4703.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #4703 ---- commit 6b7904bcfe809542216e12e4b48933fcb47d2d1d Author: Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com> Date: 2017-09-22T05:33:17Z FLINK-7659 Unprotected access to inProgress in JobCancellationWithSavepointHandlers#handleNewRequest ---- > Unprotected access to inProgress in > JobCancellationWithSavepointHandlers#handleNewRequest > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-7659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7659 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: REST > Reporter: Ted Yu > Assignee: Bowen Li > > Here is related code: > {code} > } finally { > inProgress.remove(jobId); > } > {code} > A little lower, in another finally block, there is: > {code} > synchronized (lock) { > if (!success) { > inProgress.remove(jobId); > {code} > which is correct. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)