GitHub user zentol opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4569

    [FLINK-7040] [REST] Add basics for REST communication

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    This PR implements the fundamentals for generic Client/Server REST 
communication that will be used for the client/cluster communication, the 
WebRuntimeMonitor and queryable state.
    
    #### Endpoints
    
    `Endpoints` are the main runtime component that have to be started before 
any communication can happen. Their primary purpose is setting up the 
underlying netty stack.
    
    The `RestClientEndpoint` is a fully-functional class that provides an 
asynchronous API for sending requests/receiving responses based around 
`CompleteFutures`. Requests are sent in a synchronous fashion; a new request is 
only sent out after a response was received for the previous request (for 
simplicity).
    
    The `RestServerEndpoint` is an abstract class that is very similar to the 
`WebRuntimeMonitor`. Implementations have to implement a single method 
`abstract Collection<? extends AbstractRestHandler<?, ?>> 
initializeHandlers();` that returns a collection of handlers that should be 
registered.
    
    #### Messages
    
    To send a request the client accepts 3 arguments:
    * a `MessageHeaders`
    * a `RequestBody`
    * a `ParameterMapper`
    
    `RequestBodies` represent the http message body, and will be converted to 
JSON using jackson-databind.
    
    `ParameterMappers` are used to assemble the final url, including query and 
path parameters
    
    `MessageHeaders` are stateless objects that define a link between requests 
and responses as well as provide meta-data about the communication for this 
particular pair. Headers have generic type arguments for requests and responses 
and provide some level of type-safeness; if the client and server use the same 
headers class the request/response type, url, http status codes etc. are all 
well-defined.
    Essentially, headers provide a tight coupling between handlers, clients, 
requests and responses (provided that implementations don't define arbitrary 
headers on the fly).
    
    For example, to define the communication for submitting a job one would 
define a `JobSubmitRequestBody` that contains the serialized job graph, a 
`JobSubmitResponseBody` containing the URL to track the job status and a 
`JobSubmitHeaders` class that define the HTTP method (POST), the url (e.g 
`/submit`, the response http status code (ACCEPTED).
    
    #### Handlers
    
    Someone has to deal with requests and send out responses, which is where 
the `AbstractRestHandler`  comes into play. This is an abstract class that 
manages all the netty stuff, and, just like the `MessageHeaders`, has generic 
type arguments for a `RequestBody` and `ResponseBody`. Only a single method 
must be implemented, which accepts a request and returns a response: `abstract 
CompletableFuture<HandlerResponse<P>> handleRequest(@Nonnull HandlerRequest<R> 
request);`
    
    A `HandlerRequest` contains a `RequestBody` and maps for path/query 
parameters.
    A `HandlerResponse` contains either a `ResponseBody`, or an `ErrorResponse`.
    
    ## Brief change log
    
      - Add `MessageHeaders`, `Request-/ResponseBody` for modeling messages
      - Add `AbstractRestHandler`, `HandlerRequest/-Response` for message 
processing
      - Add `RestClient-/-ServerEndpoint` that setup netty
    
    ## Verifying this change
    
    This change added tests.
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
      - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
      - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
      - The serializers: no)
      - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
      - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
    
    ## Documentation
    
      - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
      - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/zentol/flink rest_client_final

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4569.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4569
    
----
commit 6085639ad5438228ff56d66a4988cf52cbe850b2
Author: zentol <ches...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-08-16T13:17:45Z

    [FLINK-7040] [rest] Add basics for REST communication

commit af95d0729595d1c707ef3041b8fbdbc21c0d0d4a
Author: zentol <ches...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-08-21T09:53:13Z

    Add better error message for get requests with a body

commit 5a7a8c2877f2b25cc6281462007a5ff03de40781
Author: zentol <ches...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-08-21T12:40:09Z

    Consistent error message for 404

commit bc3b4afd075182cc17b1cb9343215a04b17e5253
Author: zentol <ches...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-08-21T13:00:28Z

    Rework resolve URL generation

commit efbcb82076d01f176d8fff903cfcba461591fedc
Author: zentol <ches...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-08-21T13:03:27Z

    Rework handler registration

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to