[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16126155#comment-16126155
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7213:
---------------------------------------

Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4353#discussion_r133018189
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/StateAssignmentOperation.java
 ---
    @@ -185,44 +184,66 @@ private void assignAttemptState(ExecutionJobVertex 
executionJobVertex, List<Oper
                                        subNonPartitionableState);
     
                                // PartitionedState
    -                           
reAssignSubPartitionableState(newManagedOperatorStates,
    +                           reAssignSubPartitionableState(
    +                                   newManagedOperatorStates,
                                        newRawOperatorStates,
                                        subTaskIndex,
                                        operatorIndex,
                                        subManagedOperatorState,
                                        subRawOperatorState);
     
                                // KeyedState
    -                           if (operatorIndex == operatorIDs.size() - 1) {
    -                                   subKeyedState = 
reAssignSubKeyedStates(operatorState,
    +                           if (isHeadOperator(operatorIndex, operatorIDs)) 
{
    --- End diff --
    
    Do we need this check here? From the JobManager and CheckpointCoordinator 
side, nothing should prevent non-head operators to have keyed state. It is just 
a limitation in the current API.
    
    This check seems to "enforce" an API limitation in a more general runtime 
that does not actually have a need for that restriction.


> Introduce state management by OperatorID in TaskManager
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7213
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Stefan Richter
>            Assignee: Stefan Richter
>
> Flink-5892 introduced the job manager / checkpoint coordinator part of 
> managing state on the operator level instead of the task level by introducing 
> explicit operator_id -> state mappings. However, this explicit mapping was 
> not introduced in the task manager side, so the explicit mapping is still 
> converted into a mapping that suits the implicit operator chain order.
> We should also introduce explicit operator ids to state management on the 
> task manager.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to