[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15979898#comment-15979898
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6014:
---------------------------------------

Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3524
  
    Merging this.


> Allow the registration of state objects in checkpoints
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6014
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6014
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Xiaogang Shi
>            Assignee: Xiaogang Shi
>
> This issue is the very first step towards incremental checkpointing. We 
> introduce a new state handle named {{CompositeStateHandle}} to be the base of 
> the snapshots taken by task components.  Known implementation may include 
> {{KeyedStateHandle}} (for {{KeyedStateBackend}}s), {{SubtaskState}} (for 
> subtasks, splits of {{JobVertex}}) and {{TaskState}} (for {{JobVertex}}s).
> Each {{CompositeStateHandle}} is composed of a collection of {{StateObject}s. 
> It should register all its state objects in {{StateRegistry}} when its 
> checkpoint is added into {{CompletedCheckpointStore}} (i.e., a pending 
> checkpoint completes or a complete checkpoint is reloaded in the recovery). 
> When a completed checkpoint is moved out of the {{CompletedCheckpointStore}}, 
> we should not simply discard all state objects in the checkpoint. With the 
> introduction of incremental checkpointing, a {{StateObject}} may be 
> referenced by different checkpoints. We should unregister all the state 
> objects contained in the {{StateRegistry}} first. Only those state objects 
> that are not referenced by any checkpoint can be deleted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to