[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15044966#comment-15044966
 ] 

goratz commented on FLEX-34769:
-------------------------------

I have some troubles getting the numer of characters in the TLF if you have 
images on the text sometimes they are counted but not always. Maybe that is the 
problem with lines or maybe not.

> TLF Performance issue (applyLeafFormat method)
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLEX-34769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34769
>             Project: Apache Flex
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: TLF
>    Affects Versions: Apache Flex 4.10.0, Apache Flex 4.11.0, Apache Flex 
> 4.12.0, Apache Flex 4.13.0, Apache Flex 4.14.0
>         Environment: OS: Windows 7
> AIR version: 15 and 16
> CPU: Intel i7 2630h 
> RAM: 4GB
>            Reporter: goratz
>            Assignee: Harbs
>              Labels: flex, performance, tlf
>             Fix For: Apache Flex 4.9.0
>
>         Attachments: TLFPerfTest.as, TLF_Bench.fla, textLayout_14.swc, 
> textLayout_9.1.swc
>
>
> I have a very strange performance difference between 2 versions of 
> TextLayout.swc. The first one is the swc included in Apache Flex 4.14 SDK and 
> the second one is included in Apache Flex 4.9.1. 
> I have a very large text, more or less 200 DIN-A4 pages in a Textflow. I 
> scroll to the end of the document and I underline a word. This is my result 
> underling a word in both versions. 
> Flex SDK Version     Time 
>    4.9.1                  21 ms (miliseconds). 0,02 Seconds 
>    4.14                   3.405 ms (miliseconds). 3,4 Seconds 
> The time difference happens in this line of code: 
> EditManager.applyLeafFormat(oFormat); 
> Anyone has any idea what's the problem? 
> More info: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:issues-panel



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to