[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15712351#comment-15712351 ]
Daniel Kulp commented on CXF-7159: ---------------------------------- The wsdl should be rejected prior to this error as it doesn't meet WSI Basic Profile requirements: {code} R2205 A wsdl:binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST refer, in each of its soapbind:header, soapbind:headerfault and soapbind:fault elements, only to wsdl:part element(s) that have been defined using the element attribute. {code} It shouldn't have type in there. > Schema name conflict in collect when DTO class declares XmlType > namespace=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7159 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Bug > Components: JAX-WS Runtime > Affects Versions: 2.6.1, 3.1.8 > Environment: JDK 8 > Reporter: Holger Sunke > Attachments: schemaConflict.7z > > > I'm building my DTOs using wsdl2java and tried to set up a JaxWsProxyClient > or -Server which results in > {quote} > org.apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchemaException: Schema name conflict in > collection > at org.apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchema.<init>(XmlSchema.java:126) > at org.apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchema.<init>(XmlSchema.java:140) > at > org.apache.cxf.common.xmlschema.SchemaCollection.newXmlSchemaInCollection(SchemaCollection.java:194) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBSchemaInitializer.createBridgeXsElement(JAXBSchemaInitializer.java:355) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBSchemaInitializer.checkForExistence(JAXBSchemaInitializer.java:333) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBSchemaInitializer.begin(JAXBSchemaInitializer.java:150) > at > org.apache.cxf.service.ServiceModelVisitor.visitOperation(ServiceModelVisitor.java:120) > at > org.apache.cxf.service.ServiceModelVisitor.walk(ServiceModelVisitor.java:74) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBDataBinding.initialize(JAXBDataBinding.java:396) > at > org.apache.cxf.service.factory.AbstractServiceFactoryBean.initializeDataBindings(AbstractServiceFactoryBean.java:86) > at > org.apache.cxf.wsdl.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.buildServiceFromClass(ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.java:469) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxws.support.JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.buildServiceFromClass(JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.java:696) > at > org.apache.cxf.wsdl.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.initializeServiceModel(ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.java:529) > at > org.apache.cxf.wsdl.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.create(ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.java:262) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxws.support.JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.create(JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.java:199) > at > org.apache.cxf.frontend.AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.createEndpoint(AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.java:102) > at > org.apache.cxf.frontend.ClientFactoryBean.create(ClientFactoryBean.java:91) > at > org.apache.cxf.frontend.ClientProxyFactoryBean.create(ClientProxyFactoryBean.java:157) > at > org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsProxyFactoryBean.create(JaxWsProxyFactoryBean.java:142) > at > schemaConflict.TestSchemaConflict.testSchemaConflict(TestSchemaConflict.java:28) > {quote} > The offending DTO is an Exception object: > {quote} > @WebFault(name = "parameters", targetNamespace = > "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema") > public class SimpleFault extends Exception { > private java.lang.String parameters; > .... > {quote} > Sources from WSDL: > {quote} > ... > <wsdl:message name="SimpleFault"> > <wsdl:part name="parameters" type="xsd:string"></wsdl:part> > </wsdl:message> > ... > <wsdl:fault name="Servicefault" message="tns:SimpleFault" /> > {quote} > The offending Namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema is already added on > schema collection instantiation and thus a conflict is determined as soon as > the SimpleFault is hit on initialization. > -I have devleoped a standalone test case you only need to extract and run > "mvn test" for reproducing this. How can I upload it?- -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)