[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15593309#comment-15593309
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-6986:
-------------------------------------
Github user johnament commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/182#discussion_r84393963
--- Diff: integration/cdi/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cdi/CdiUtil.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.cxf.cdi;
--- End diff --
The problem is that its duplicated. CDI 2.0 is introducing a better bean
definition tool, would prefer to wait until that's available to leverage.
> Don't require an application class if using CDI
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-6986
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.1.6
> Reporter: John D. Ament
>
> The current CXF-CDI integration assumes there will be an application class.
> It would be great if CXF did not require an application class, to simplify
> developer workload.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
