[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15558753#comment-15558753 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-7080: ------------------------------------- GitHub user spark404 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/175 [CXF-7080] Add KeyName as KeyIdentifier You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/spark404/cxf CXF-7080 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/175.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #175 ---- commit d3f0054090c06dfda6a24a6402b591c45e95c8b0 Author: Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl> Date: 2016-10-08T21:28:16Z [CXF-7080] Add KeyName as KeyIdentifier ---- > XmlSecOutInterceptor doesn't recognise KeyName as a KeyIdentifier > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-7080 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7080 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Bug > Components: JAX-RS Security > Affects Versions: 3.2.0, 3.1.8 > Reporter: Hugo Trippaers > > The KeyIdentifier type KeyName is a known element in the KeyInfo structure > (https://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/#sec-KeyName) however the interceptor > XmlSecOutInterceptor doesn't recognise it. > This causes the interceptor to assume the keyidentifier is X509KeyIdentifier, > which in turn causes the undesired behaviour of the message being signed and > sent with a keyidentifier that is not parsed by the endpoint. (Who expects a > KeyName). > A small fix is to add KeyName as a valid KeyIdentifier allowing lower level > libraries (santuario) to indicate that this KeyIdentifier type is not > supported (yet, working on that as well) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)