[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15309417#comment-15309417
]
Vedran Pavic commented on CXF-6869:
-----------------------------------
Sidenote - I originally named starter modules
{{cxf-spring-boot-starter-jax-rs}} and {{cxf-spring-boot-starter-jax-ws}}, but
looking at the names of other CXF modules (namely {{cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs}} and
{{cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws}}) I wonder starter should be named
{{cxf-spring-boot-starter-jaxrs}} and {{cxf-spring-boot-starter-jaxws}} for
consistency?
> Consider adding Spring Boot starter
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-6869
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Integration
> Reporter: Vedran Pavic
> Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>
> I've recently authored a PR in Spring Boot to add support for
> auto-configuration of {{CXFServlet}} and default CXF's configuration:
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/5659
> The PR was closed with "won't fix" resolution since Boot team are unwilling
> to add CXF as a dependency to the project. Instead a 3rd party starter was
> suggested.
> The concept of a 3rd party starter is generally encouraged for technologies
> that don't have first-class support in projects from Spring portfolio. Such
> 3rd party starters are listed here:
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-starters/README.adoc
> If CXF team is interested, I'm willing to port my PR to CXF.
> Note that the original PR was focused around JAX-WS support, but can be
> easily expanded to include JAX-RS support as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
