[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14325793#comment-14325793
]
Colm O hEigeartaigh commented on CXF-6255:
------------------------------------------
I've changed it to the following instead: "The request is a SOAP Fault, but it
is not secured" - I think this is clearer than the original. I don't think it's
necessary to add advice about how other services can secure messages.
Colm.
> WSS4JInInterceptor: "Security header, but it's a fault"
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-6255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6255
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Richard O'Sullivan
> Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> When CXF processes a SoapFault it logs this WARNing: "Request does not
> contain Security header, but it's a fault.". The message is logged from the
> handleMessage at WSS4JInInterceptor in the package
> org.apache.cxf.ws.security.wss4j.
> The message is cryptic but I think it is intended to be an INFO or DEBUG
> instead of a WARN.
> If I'm correct please make this an INFO or a DEBUG; otherwise, rewrite the
> message to indicate a course of action to eliminate the warning.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
