[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13949336#comment-13949336
 ] 

Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-5576:
---------------------------------------

Hi Andriy, 
sounds good :-), and please take your time, IMHO it is not very urgent. if we 
can have just a zero based approach covered before 3.0 then it would be nice.

I'm still a bit unclear about having JAX-RS and JAX-WS extensions collocated. 
Assuming we do go ahead with the single module only then I guess it both JAX-RS 
and later JAX-WS dependencies would need to be made optional. Another question 
is whether it is OK for a single javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension resource 
list both JAX-RS and JAX-WS extensions (this will need to be done if we go 
ahead with a single module). It is probably OK because I guess we can expect 
that the user will deploy either JAX-WS or JAX-RS... I guess we need to sort 
out these issues before actually resolving this JIRA

Thanks, Sergey 


> Initital support for CDI integration
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5576
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Andriy Redko
>            Assignee: Andriy Redko
>              Labels: cdi
>         Attachments: weld-one-jar.zip, weld-one-war.zip
>
>
> A per section 10.2.3 Context and Dependency Injection (CDI) of JAX-RS 2.0 
> specification, in a product that supports CDI, the implementations MUST 
> support the use of CDI-style Beans as root resource classes, providers and 
> Application subclasses. Providers and Application subclasses MUST be 
> singletons or use application scope.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to