[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13090826#comment-13090826
 ] 

Willem Jiang commented on CXF-3720:
-----------------------------------

According to SOAP/JMS specification, the SOAPJMS_soapAction header is optional.
And if using SOAP 1.2 binding, we need to check this property matches the one 
within the content-type.
{code}
[Definition: If using SOAP 1.2, and the contentType property has an action 
parameter, that parameter value is compared with the SOAPJMS_soapAction value. 
A fault MUST be generated with fault subcode mismatchedSoapAction if the SOAP 
1.2 action does not match the SOAPJMS_soapAction value.†]
{code}

> SOAP over JMS miss SOAPJMS_soapAction property
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-3720
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3720
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Soap Binding
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>         Environment: Windows Server 2008 R2
>            Reporter: Jorge Flores
>            Assignee: Freeman Fang
>
> I have created a service consumer using the CXF JMSConfigFeature. I notice 
> the SOAP action in the generated request message is included in the JMS 
> custom property SOAPJMS_contentType. For example,   
> Properties={
>     "SOAPJMS_isFault"={boolean:false}
>     "SOAPJMS_contentType"={string:'application/soap+xml; action="sayHello"; 
> charset=UTF-8'} 
>     "SOAPJMS_bindingVersion"={string:'1.0'}} 
> Is there any reason why the header property 'SOAPJMS_soapAction' is not 
> included in the CXF SOAP/JMS implementation? 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to