[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Sauthier closed CXF-1714.
-----------------------------------

    Estimated Complexity: Novice  (was: Moderate)

Thanks for the fix

> ASM package are not stated as optional imports in the bundle's MANIFEST
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-1714
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1714
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: OSGi
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.1, 2.0.7
>         Environment: OW2 JOnAS , using CXF in an OSGi gateway (Felix)
>            Reporter: Guillaume Sauthier
>            Assignee: Daniel Kulp
>             Fix For: 2.4.1
>
>
> I've found that the package 'org.objectweb.asm' was in the list of 
> Import-Package of the bundle.
> It's not described as optional, even if in the code (I looked at the 
> WrapperHelper class) it seems to handle the case where ASM is not present, so 
> I cannot deploy the CXF bundle if the gateway do not have the 
> 'org.objectweb.asm' package available.
> So it seems logical to add a resolution:=optional statement in the bnd file.
> I have described that issue as a wish because there is a simple workaround: 
> simply provide a bundle exporting the right package; but I don't really like 
> this solution because, I know, from experience, that ASM is not a easily 
> shareable library, because of API incompatibilities, it far more easier to 
> embed its privatized version of ASM (using jarjar or the "new" 
> maven-shadow-plugin its easy) in a private package: org.apache.cxf.asm. So 
> that you don't have to describe the imports because ASM is now part of the 
> distribution + you are sure to never have ASM version incompatibilities 
> issue. Moreover, the ASM core is really lightweight...
> So to sum up, I have 2 solutions:
> 1. add resolution:=optional to the import statement
> 2. or privatize ASM automatically
> My preference goes to #2 :)
> BTW, does that make sens to have a "Bundle" component in JIRA, or the OSGi 
> issues will go to the "Build system" component ?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to