[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972046#action_12972046
]
Freeman Fang commented on CXF-3194:
-----------------------------------
Hi,
This problem should be caused by there're two copys of xmlbeans.jar, one in
your war, one in JBOSS container classpath.
Could you check if it's this case, if so, then you should configure your JBOSS
container to use self-first classloader(this term is different across different
container, not exactly sure what's it in JBOSS) to ensure only xmlbean.jar in
your war get loaded.
Btw, IMHO you should post this kind of question on maillinglist first, other
than create a jira ticket directly.
Regards
Freeman
> Probem when i deploy a war contening cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.11.jar in jboss
> 6.M5
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-3194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3194
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.2.11
> Environment: Linux Ubuntu
> JBoss 6.0.0.M5
> Reporter: Sandra T
>
> I have a war that imports cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.11.jar. And
> cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.11.jar needs xmlbeans-2.4.0.jar.
> When I deploy my war, I have the following error in JBoss :
> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error visiting resource:
> VFSResourceContext @
> org/apache/xmlbeans/impl/store/Xobj$DetailEntryXobj.class /
> baseclassloa...@ffab3f{vfs:///home/sandraT/Logiciels/jboss-6.0.0.20100911-M5/server/default/deploy/MyApp.war},
> visitor:
> org.jboss.scanning.annotations.plugins.genericannotationvisi...@c41d96
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.plugins.visitor.IgnoreSetErrorHandler.handleError(IgnoreSetErrorHandler.java:56)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.plugins.visitor.ReflectResourceVisitor.visit(ReflectResourceVisitor.java:91)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.annotations.plugins.AnnotationsScanningPlugin.visit(AnnotationsScanningPlugin.java:89)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.spi.helpers.ScanningPluginWrapper.visit(ScanningPluginWrapper.java:112)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> at
> org.jboss.classloading.plugins.visitor.FederatedResourceVisitor.visit(FederatedResourceVisitor.java:101)
> [jboss-classloading.jar:2.2.0.Alpha8]
> at
> org.jboss.classloading.plugins.vfs.VFSResourceVisitor.visit(VFSResourceVisitor.java:264)
> [jboss-classloading-vfs.jar:2.2.0.Alpha8]
> ... 50 more
> Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation in interface
> itable initialization: when resolving method
> "org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.store.Xobj$ElementXobj.getSchemaTypeInfo()Lorg/w3c/dom/TypeInfo;"
> the class loader (instance of
> org/jboss/classloader/spi/base/BaseClassLoader) of the current class,
> org/apache/xmlbeans/impl/store/Xobj$ElementXobj, and the class loader
> (instance of <bootloader>) for interface org/w3c/dom/Element have different
> Class objects for the type org/w3c/dom/TypeInfo used in the signature
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0(Native Method) [:1.6.0_16]
> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:2389)
> [:1.6.0_16]
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:1836) [:1.6.0_16]
> at
> org.jboss.reflect.plugins.introspection.IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl.getDeclaredConstructors(IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl.java:559)
> [jboss-reflect.jar:2.2.0.Alpha9]
> at
> org.jboss.reflect.plugins.introspection.IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl.getConstructors(IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl.java:158)
> [jboss-reflect.jar:2.2.0.Alpha9]
> at
> org.jboss.reflect.plugins.ClassInfoImpl.getDeclaredConstructors(ClassInfoImpl.java:446)
> [jboss-reflect.jar:2.2.0.Alpha9]
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.plugins.visitor.ClassHierarchyResourceVisitor.handleClass(ClassHierarchyResourceVisitor.java:79)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.plugins.visitor.ReflectResourceVisitor.doVisit(ReflectResourceVisitor.java:108)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> at
> org.jboss.scanning.plugins.visitor.ReflectResourceVisitor.visit(ReflectResourceVisitor.java:86)
> [:1.0.0.Alpha6]
> ... 54 more
> what is the workaround for this problem?
> Sanrda
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
