[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12842971#action_12842971
 ] 

Daniel Kulp commented on CXF-2690:
----------------------------------


Ah.  Ok.

Then this is more or less working as designed/per spec.   On a one-way, the 
response is supposed to be a 202 Accepted without any content.   There should 
not be Content-Type header at all (which I just fixed) as there is no content.  
Thus, there wouldn't be a way for the "negotiation" stuff to kick in with 
one-ways.

> Oneway MEP with fastInfoset without 'force' results in no compression
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-2690
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2690
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: OtherDatabindings, Transports
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.6
>         Environment: Windows Vista
> jdk1.6.0_07
>            Reporter: Reinis Vicups
>
> If a fastInfoset (accept=application/fastinfoset) @Oneway Message is sent to 
> the Server and 'force' option of the fastInfoset is not set to 'true', the 
> server would give 202 response and would use content-type: text/xml like this:
> 15:04:33,000 DEBUG [main] cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit (2132)     - Header 
> fields:
>     null: [HTTP/1.1 202 Accepted]
>     Content-Length: [0]
>     Content-Type: [text/xml]
>     Server: [Jetty(6.1.21)]
> I am not sure if this is the consequence of server answering with text/xml, 
> but as a result the client issues all of the following requests with text/xml 
> aswell instead of switching to application/fastinfoset.
> Per definition fastinfoset works like this:
> 1. client requests server with content-type:text/xml but indicates that it 
> (client) accept:application/fastinfoset;
> 2. server responds with content-type:application/fastinfoset
> 3. all the following requests from client to server will be with 
> content-type:application/fastinfoset
> Additional info that might be relevant:
> - I have tested with multiple messages (not just two)
> - All messages were sent from the same instance of client and received by the 
> same instance of server (no new instances were created)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to