[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Hadrosek updated CXF-2343:
-------------------------------
Attachment: cxf.patch
Code to replace bogus message selector.
> Improve Message Performance Under High Volume with Low Latency Consumers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-2343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2343
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Transports
> Reporter: Paul Hadrosek
> Attachments: cxf.patch
>
>
> IT organizations are on constant pressures in improving enterprise messaging
> systems to deliver and process high volume message traffic. For example
> financial IT organizations are continually automate, integrate and optimized
> the transaction life cycle. The underlying messaging system must be able to
> support extremely low latency and very high message throughput with effective
> congestion control.
> Message performance testing was performed to evaluate the CXF bogus message
> selector implementation as the best approach in improving message throttling
> in a long consumer service process with a very high JMS message traffic
> volume.
> The intent of the bogus message selector implementation in CXF is to
> alleviate message throttling by delegating incoming messages to under
> performed consumer services. Testing was performed on the CXF bogus message
> selector implementation with a commercial JMS message broker. The test
> scenario simulated an ingest driver that produced high volume message traffic
> with a long running CXF consumer service which forced a backlog of messages
> in the request queue. The test results illustrated a dramatic degradation in
> the commercial JMS message broker processing performance from 12,000 messages
> per second to 100 messages per second (99.17% degradation of performance).
> Also it was observed the JMS receiveTimeout parameter was set to the default
> value of 1 which contributed to the degradation of performance. CXF was
> modified to expose the JMS receiveTimeout parameter as a CXF feature. The
> test scenario was rerun with a receiveTimeout set to 30 seconds which
> improved message processing from 100 messages per second to 4,918 messages
> per second.
> To further improve ingest message processing performance; the bogus message
> selector implementation was replaced with a stop and start Spring JMS
> Listener Container (DefaultMessageListenerContainer) implementation via the
> CXF JMSContinuation class. The JMSContintuation class starts and stops the
> Spring Container based on the maximum suspended continuations parameter. The
> moment a stop is issued from the JMSContinuation class to the Container, no
> new messages are allowed to be accepted by the Container until the Container
> completes processing the suspended messages. To avoid message loss while the
> Container is in the stop state, CXF features must support the JMS
> acceptMessagesWhileStopping parameter. This parameter must be set to true to
> notify the Container not to reject messages while in the stop state. The test
> scenario was rerun using the CXF start/stop Container implementation with a
> commercial JMS message broker. The test results demonstrated that message
> processing performance improved from 4,918 messages per second to 8,333
> messages per second.
> Based on the test results, I concluded that the start/stop Container
> implementation is the recommended solution for improving message performance
> in high JMS message traffic with low latency consumers. The start/stop
> Container implementation improved message processing performance over the
> bogus message selector implementation by 28%.
> See attachment for patch.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
