[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647891#action_12647891
]
Benson Margulies commented on CXF-1807:
---------------------------------------
Could you at least supply a failing test case?
> Inconsistent Databinding relationship between ClientProxyBean/ServiceFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1807
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Simple Frontend
> Affects Versions: 2.1.1, 2.1.2
> Reporter: Bryan Stopp
>
> When creating a ClientProxyFactoryBean through the use of the spring
> defintion <simple:client> the data-binding definition is not passed on to all
> appropriate associated objects in the correct order. (NOTE: All line numbers
> references are based on v2.1.2 of the source code. Notation is [EMAIL
> PROTECTED])
> The ClientProxyFactoryBean sets it's dataBinding onto the ClientFactoryBean
> @line 94. This associates the dataBinding with the ClientFactoryBean
> (attribute dataBinding on parent AbstractEndpointFactory).
> However a request is made to execute the create() method on ClientFactoryBean
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), one of the first tasks is to execute applyExtraClass()
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I believe this assists in defining an inheritance model
> for the class tree. This method retrieves the dataBinding from the
> _serviceFactory_ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and then proceeds to apply the extra
> classes as per the property.
> However, at this time the ServiceFactory (attribute serviceFactory on parent
> AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory) has not been initialized. This doesn't
> occur the method createEndPoint() is invoked ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). It isn't
> until the createEndPoint() method is invoke that a check is made against the
> ServiceFactory to determine it's state.
> Once it's identified that the service hasn't been initialized,
> initializeServiceFactory() ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is invoked, which then
> associates the original dataBinding defined at the ClientProxyFactoryBean
> definition with the ServiceFactory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> However, by this time, an invalid (ie: the default) dataBinding definition
> was used to define the additional classes for the inheritance model.
> What brought this to my attention was: i was trying to utilize the
> AegisDataBinding to map my class tree, however it wasn't being configured
> correctly.
> -B
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
