[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christian Schneider closed CXF-1773.
------------------------------------


Thanks

> Refactor JMS transport for readability and simplicity (patch included)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-1773
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1773
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Transports
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.2
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>            Assignee: Willem Jiang
>             Fix For: 2.1.3
>
>         Attachments: cxf-1773-refactor-jms.patch
>
>
> In preparation for the planned improvements for JMS config like discussed on 
> the mailing list the JMS transport should be refactored for readability.
> I have worked myself into the JMS code and at the start had some problems 
> understanding what happened because of some structures in the code.
> The first thing was JMSTransportBase. Most of the class are methods that do 
> not access any attributes. These methods could be made static and moved to 
> the JMSUtil class. The method isDestinationStyleQueue is the only method that 
> needs an attribute. I think it should have this attribute as a parameter and 
> also be made static and moved to JMSUtils.
> The rest of JMSTransportBase are only holders for attributes that are then 
> accessed from JMSConduit and JMSDestination directly (even without getters). 
> So I think the whole class could be dumped and to attributes should be moved 
> to the subclasses. The readability of JMSConduit and JMSDestination is much 
> better afterwards as the class can be understood in itself.
> The next thing is JMSTransport which is used to feed JMSProviderHub. I think 
> it should be cut down to the callback method connected and be renamed to 
> JMSOnConnectCallBack. The other two methods can be added to the parameters of 
> JMSProviderHub. The advantage is that it is much clearer what 
> JMSProviderHub.connect needs and that connected is a callback that gets 
> called at the end of connect.
> I have already done the refactorings and will attach a patch with them. 
> Checkstyle, PMD and surefire show no problems.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to